You can’t see the cyclist image being hurt either? Nothing I say makes sense? I wouldn’t expect that it would to you, as you are also a product of group thinking and can’t tolerate any view other than what you perceive as the forums view.
The beauty is you will never see it either, as if a statement of fact or different point of view is put up, first it has to be analysed as to where or what “Position” I am coming from. The point of the post to you is irrelevant. Ok I have been arguing a point of law; it sure is not a popular view.
But who out of the last so many replies have actually bothered to acknowledge the issue? Not one of you, care about it. What matters is the group has somehow magically been attacked....All too en-compassing hey!
I have made an analogy of a fellow cyclist allegedly hurt on the road due to an alleged rider pleasing himself with the road rules, which nearly happened to Victor, and not one of the “Hurt” group members cared to address the point. Including your good self.
But you take shelter in the group thinking as well, and feel under siege if you can’t understand a position?
On a previous thread you tried to antagonise me with; “You bring up an old thread and run with it etc, etc.” I had to dig up examples where many older threads ar built on, I had to again defend myself. And on that occasion you did not even reply to the post, but rather to impose your good self on me........... Why did you do that? So what have I done to you?.... All you wanted to do was shut me down.
And then you admitted my posting was correct; a precedent had been set and I proved many old post get added on to by many members. But you still had to give me recognition of your distaste for me daring to make the post, so you finish with the derogatory “buzzalong.” I haven’t seen you address others in this manner.
And you are getting more personal as you hunt for me, with “you've established diminished something alright” and certainly framing you reply to solicit a favourable response to your goading.
But this will all go over your righteously indignant head I am sure.
I have to say the title antagonist would fit you as well. You only reply to insert a blade and then watch for a reaction. The answer to a post is irrelevant to you.
bikealong wrote:Sure I called you an antagonist, but when I continually have to cop your supercilious, "meh" and "add nausium" It kind of affects a person that way, don’t you agree?
bikealong wrote:But he sure as hell harms the cyclist image, does he not?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests