Pete wrote:Yep, I'd vote for option 1. But cannot see why it should be the most expensive (even more costly than option 2, which loses more car-parking spaces).
Failing that I think option 4 is the next best.
It's more expensive because it involves keeping more car lanes and therefore ripping apart the whole foot path to give room to the cars.
Option 4 seems pretty cool, and cheap too! If you have rumble strips and separation from car doors why not!