weg wrote:Bleve wrote:If they did them at 80, 160 & 240, it would make sense ... But Craven won't change it.
Why would that be? Reading everyone's reports it sounds like a big problem that could be easily fixed.
When my daughter did the feed stations at last years Warny, she said it was a real struggle to get from one feed station to the next in time for the riders, because they didn't drive on the main route & had to take a long way around. With that many riders there are a lot of people & cars to get to the next feed station. It was a big rush to get there in time & be ready. So easy fixed? Maybe not.